Process

A measured process, from concept to construction.

Most structural problems are not solved on the day they are discovered. They are avoided earlier, in a conversation with the right engineer.

01
Concept

Early structural strategy

Comten is most useful before architecture and scope are locked. A short conversation can test constraints, likely framing, slab strategy and structural decisions that drive cost.

  • Constraints and geotechnical review
  • Likely framing and slab strategy
  • Cost-driving decisions flagged early
02
Preliminary

Information review

Drawings, photos, reports and site context are reviewed so the structural pathway and missing information are clear before documentation starts.

  • Drawings and site context
  • Existing reports and photos
  • Scope gaps identified early
03
Documentation

Engineering delivery

Structural drawings, reports or certification support are documented with practical coordination for the builder, architect, certifier or client team.

  • Clear documentation
  • Buildable detailing
  • Coordination with stakeholders
04
Construction

Site support and certification

RFIs are answered quickly where possible, shop drawings are reviewed in detail, and Form 12 aspect certificates or RPEQ inspections are handled cleanly where needed.

  • Same-day RFIs where possible
  • RPEQ inspections at key stages
  • Form 12 aspect certificates
02Why timing matters

The cheapest time to change a structure is before it's drawn.

A structural engineer's influence on cost and buildability is highest at concept and falls once documentation is complete. The cost of changing anything climbs the other way.

Structural design leverage and cost of change by project stageAbility to influence the structural outcome falls from concept to construction while the relative cost of change rises.ConceptSchematicDesign developmentDocumentationConstruction
Ability to influence outcomeRelative cost of change

Concept is where structural choices have the most leverage. Hover or focus a stage to compare influence and cost.

Conceptual diagram based on the standard MacLeamy design-leverage pattern.

ECI

It is why Comten would rather talk early than quote late.

Engaged at concept, a structural engineer can test the slab system, grid and foundations while they are still cheap to change. By documentation, changing those decisions means re-issuing drawings and re-coordinating the consultant team.

Project pathway

Find the likely structural pathway.

Answer four quick prompts and we'll map the likely next step — no detail required.

Step 1 of 4Project type
What best describes the project?

Educational only. Not engineering advice, certification or a fee estimate.

Your likely pathway

Discovery Pathway

    Next step

    Start enquiry
    FAQ

    Process questions.

    As early as possible. The concept-stage conversation is often the cheapest way to take risk or unnecessary cost out of a structure.

    Yes. Comten can review the current design direction, identify missing information and confirm whether the structure is heading toward a practical buildable solution.

    Yes. RFIs, shop drawing review, site visits, RPEQ inspections and Form 12 aspect certificates can be supported where required.

    Yes. If structural costs feel high, a short review can show whether the structure is sized to what the building actually needs.

    Next step

    Have a structural question?

    Start with a clear conversation about the project, the issue and the next practical step.

    Make contact